A couple of days ago, I wrote an op-ed letter in the Journal News on the recently signed AZ law that will make all people of color a suspect class. The response to my letter online was impressive. The responders were uniquely intolerant, bigoted, and simply racist – full of anger. They wished that I would die, be deported, be de-naturalized or simply disappear for having the opportunity to morally stand up and speak out against this unjust law. The overwhelming response was mean-spirited and hurtful. I think in the first day, out of the 68 letters written, only one advocated compassion and tolerance (this writer got whacked too!). Welcome to America! Speak out against injustice and indifference. Live for a world as advocated by Dr. Martin Luther King and Cesar Chavez.
Please read the posting by the Southern Poverty Law Center, a watchdog organization for Human Rights.
Arizona Immigration Law Violates Constitution, Guarantees Racial Profiling
By Mary Bauer, SPLC Legal Director
Arizona’s newly adopted immigration law is brazenly unconstitutional and will undoubtedly trample upon the civil rights of residents caught in its path.
By requiring local law enforcement to arrest a person when there is “reasonable suspicion” that the person is in the country illegally, Arizona lawmakers have created a system that guarantees racial profiling. They also have usurped federal authority by attempting to enforce immigration law.
Quite simply, this law is a civil rights disaster and an insult to American values. No one in our country should be required to produce their “papers” on demand to prove their innocence. What kind of country are we becoming?
When Arizona Governor Jan Brewer was asked what an undocumented immigrant looks like, she responded: “I do not know what an illegal immigrant looks like. I can tell you that I think there are people in Arizona who assume that they know what an illegal immigrant looks like.”
We all know what the outcome of all this double-talk will be. People with brown skin – regardless of whether they are U.S. citizens or legal residents – will be forced to prove their legal status to law enforcement officers time and again. One-third of Arizona’s population – those who are Latino – will be designated as second-class citizens, making anyone with brown skin a suspect even if their families have called Arizona home for generations.
Given the authors of this law, no one should be surprised about its intended targets. The law was drafted by a lawyer for the legal arm of the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), whose founder has warned of a “Latin onslaught” and complained about Latinos’ alleged low “educability.” FAIR has accepted $1.2 million from the Pioneer Fund, a racist foundation that was set up by Nazi sympathizers to fund studies of eugenics, the science of selective breeding to produce a “better” race. The legislation was sponsored by state Senator Russell Pearce, who once e-mailed an anti-Semitic article from the neo-Nazi National Alliance website to supporters.
Making matters worse, lawmakers have allowed citizens to sue local law enforcement agencies that they believe are not adequately enforcing the new law. One can be sure that FAIR and its proxies are salivating at the prospects.
The law is not only unconstitutional, it’s bad public policy and will interfere with effective policing in Arizona’s communities. That’s why the legislation was opposed by the Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police. As Latinos grow more fearful of law enforcement, they will be more reluctant to report crimes, and witnesses will be less likely to cooperate with police. Criminals will target the Latino community, confident their victims will keep quiet.
Lawmakers in other states are eager to replicate this ill-advised law. Their frustration with current immigration policy is understandable, but this system must be remedied by our Congress, which should enact fair immigration reform. The federal government must craft a policy that repairs our broken immigration system and, at the same time, protects our most cherished values. States that attempt to follow Arizona’s example will only succeed in sowing fear, discord and intolerance in our communities while undermining law enforcement and inviting costly constitutional challenges.
Should these people be stopped by the Arizona Police or not?
A legal immigrant to the US has to endure this:
F1 Unmarried sons and daughters (21 years of age or older) of U.S. citizens Wait time: 6–7 years
F2A Spouses and minor children (under 21 year old) of lawful permanent residents Wait time: 4–5 years
F2B Unmarried sons and daughters (21 years of age or older) of lawful
permanent residents Wait time: 9–10 years
F3 Married sons and daughters of U.S. citizens Wait time: 8–9 years
F4 Brothers and sisters of adult U.S. citizens Wait time: 10–11 years
EB3 Skilled workers, professionals, and other workers Wait time: 7–8 years
Whose effort should we honor with citizenship, the men in the pickup trucks or the hundreds of thousands of legal immigrants who did everything this country asked them to do to become resident aliens and/or eventualy citizens?
AZ law
Were the identical law to be adopted in Wyoming, would it be racist? Of course not! How about Kansas? Of course not! It is regarded as racist only because it is adopted in a state bordering on Mexico where most illegal aliens are Hispanic. That is not racist. That is a fact. Every statement involving race is not racist. For instance, to say that most Hispanic people have dark eyes is not racist; it is factual. To say that most illegal aliens in Arizona are Mexicans is not racist; it is factual. I wish no harm to the author of this or any other article. I simply believe that he is misguided and has not properly thought the issue out.
Jack Wagner, M.D.